Converting EX to an MX?

[davis224]

Did a search amd didn't see anything, so apologies if it's already been covered. I'm getting close to pulling the trigger on a stark, and I'll likely be riding MX 90% of the time, but the idea of being able to ride it to work, or to a nearby trail is super tempting to me. Has anyone done this? What works/doesn't work well?

Ideally I'd order one with MX suspension and be getting a set of MX plastics with no lights/plate/etc and a separate set of rims and tires for street/dual sport. How does the battery hold up on street riding? Would say a 30 minute ride at 45-60mph on country roads be doable or completely drain the battery? If I get it with MX suspension, is everything else nearly identical? Or should I be more sensible and just get an MX and haul it?

 

[Erwin P]

An MX is just an EX with harder suspension and no lights.

I've owned a MX 1.0 for 2,5 years and since very short an EX. On the street with street tyres i seem to get 95km or 59 miles.

Get the gearing taller and range gets better, but your speedo will be off.

 

[DaveAusNor]

Hi Davis,

I'm running a very similar use case to yours. I ride to the MX track near me (15 mins away, 10% battery each way), and then hit a bunch of laps before riding home. All I have to remove at the track is my number plate and underbar mirror. I usually disconnect the headlight too.

I also use the bike to commute to work (although with SM wheels and different gearing). With SM and 14/45 gearing I get approximately 1% battery per kilometre (50-80 kmph roads). So maybe could stretch 60miles if its less highway riding. The battery gets eaten up significantly more if you're over 45mph for longer stretches. I would recommend you get the EX with the hardest suspension (better for MX).

 

[Lost]

I use my EX as a daily and get about 3 hours ride time on 50-120km roads. Stock gearing, stock wheels.

 

[Karinshi]

i think the best choice is choosing the EX with MX suspension, and then you have a street legal MX weapon

By the way @Erwin P the EX and MX has the same frame? for example, my local dealer told me the other day that the SM frame is weaker than the EX frame, that if you use the SM frame on enduro type riding it could broke easily... This has worried me in part, but on the other hand, it seems like an exaggeration... supermoto bikes have always been used aggressively too, with flat jumps and a bit of abuse on the street... it sounds strange to me

 

[DaveAusNor]

I wouldn't think the frame is any different at all on any of the bikes, just the forks on the SM.

 

[Karinshi]

I wouldn't think the frame is any different at all on any of the bikes, just the forks on the SM.

i just look into the web and both the EX and SM seems to have the same parts name on the frame "SEX1-F-W-KT" but the MX has a different one "SMX1-F-W-KT"

my local dealer is smoking something...

 

[AL_V]

I wouldn't think the frame is any different at all on any of the bikes, just the forks on the SM.

When the EX came out they said it had a more flexible frame.
Not sure if I believe it, but even so, I doubt if I could tell the difference.

 

[Erwin P]

When the EX came out they said it had a more flexible frame.
Not sure if I believe it, but even so, I doubt if I could tell the difference.

I can't feel it. But the suspension is worlds apart.

 

[AL_V]

I can't feel it. But the suspension is worlds apart.

Yea, i’ve heard that they went from too stiff on the MX bike, to too soft on the EX.
Is the EX suspension decent with out a revalve?

 

[Erwin P]

For us the MX was actually quite fine. We're a sand MX country. Pretty much every suspension gets beefed up around here. Mine is still stock but a lot of people had the front stiffened by tuners.

I'm ot 100% sure about the EX. 1 day of minor offroad (with beginners) and a few days on SM wheels on the street. It's not soft out there.
Will be going on an Enduro trip in a few weeks. But that will be Hard Enduro and i never had a bike quite soft enough for that.