FDR depends on the conditions, map selection, and ones objective. If traction is a concern, then a taller ratio (lower numeric ratio) will often be of advantage. If you have plenty of grip, and looking for maximum acceleration at lower speeds, then a shorter ratio (higher numeric ratio) will often be of some advantage. Erzberg was an extreme case as one must climb out of the mine with speeds often exceeding 85 mph. Even with sustained wide open throttle the Alta would not carry a sustained top speed of 85 mph under such conditions without thermal limiting the motor. The compromise was to shorten the FDR to provide a greater mechanical advantage with the compromise being that of top speed. All in all, the FDR is relatively insensitive regarding the Alta in most situations, and therefore often becomes more about feel, than calculated optimum. For what it may be worth, 14 / 53 was our go to gearing regarding most applications. All that said, and as with the MXR suspension, these values were established using top level athletes most of the time. In hindsight, we likely should have tested more with B and C riders as our test pilots seldom missed their mark (not much over jumping or coming up short) placing our MXR settings on the light side for some. Average, fully dressed weight was between 180 and 200 pounds, and ability, was top level athlete, with Kris Keefer being our primary test pilot. Glen Helen, Pala and Milestone being the predominant test facilities. Rider feedback, data acquisition (lap times, split times, average speed, minimum speed and top speed) along with close observation being the markers used.