Very doubtful, these things are constantly rebranded by different companies all the time. Wouldn't surprise me if the KTM started as something else. Recent example: The Yozma IN10 is the same bike as the Valtinsu EM-5, which is also the same as the Throne Strike. Same chassis rebranded between different companies with minor variations.I like this bike especially considering the price. Wouldn’t KTM have some kind of legal recourse as it’s a clone.
Generally, I wouldn't say PDS is better for technical or HE riding. I own a relatively new KTM 300 2T PDS and there are both benefits and drawbacks to PDS. The benefits are ground clearance and sometimes lower seat heights and excellent stability in most riding cases.I've never ridden a PDS shock before, but they are apparently better for technical hard-enduro type riding, where linkages are better for fast desert and motocross-type riding. Since I only ride boulder-infested woods, the linkless rear end will likely be fine for me.
As for the forks, they adjust the same as both my CRF250X and my CR125R (both have cast triple clamps, BTW). 'Course, I bought both new in 2008, so maybe tech has changed. Both work great in my boulders though, so I think the forks will be fine too. Travel is slightly shorter than typical MX bikes by a couple inches (~10" travel), but I'm looking forward to the slightly lower seat height (I'm short).

Cool. I don't think WP even have it wrung out completely yet. I think you probably made the right choice. Let us know how it works out for you.I ended up ordering a linkage rear-end on my Omega. It seemed better for the rugged terrain that I ride, and having never ridden a PDS system, I figured better safe than sorry. I also worried that the PDS shock might be inferior, only because the suspension was developed in-house. Apparently it took WP several years to get it right.