Search results

This doesn't need to be a new model. They've been implementing updates on existing models from the start. An early MX1.0 and later ones had some very different components. The MX1.2 had so many new parts it was impossible to interchange E bits. So it became a new model. But only a 1.2, not a 2...

Didn't watch it to be fair. However that could also just be a low hp setting.

12 vs 13 shouldn't matter much. But on my MX1.0 a 13 vs 15 could get as much as 10-15% gain in range.

I use 13 on the street so my speedo remains true with stock rear sprocket. If the speedo wasn't an issue i would go 15 on the front and stock or smaller on the rear. It will get you better range as well.

Or the 260 on the SM wheels. For on the street it still brakes more than fine. For proper SM it will overheat as i found out :ROFLMAO:

Your speedo will be off by about 8% luckely that's exactly what a 13 instead of 12 does for you. For actual dirt enduro riding a 13 or 14 is betteranyways. The 12 is wayyy to steep for anything exept Gnarly stuff.

You're missing the tiny pin. Mine has broken out of the left hand rear brake as well. Since new from the dealer.

I know because i had the Stark MX 1.0 since the beginning. We got: - Reverse - Crawl mode - More clear kW charge rate over Amps. - We got a more controlable power curve. In the beginning it was too snappy. - I've seen range upgraded about 15%, probably due to more relaxed mapping. - The phone...

In all honesty. That 2023 was a decade old tech when it was sold.

Same here. When it comes to riding i actually feel the Stark is closer to a 2 than a 4 stroke.

You won't feel te difference. I have them for some while. Just because the dealer had them in stock and not the normal ones. They seem more robust so far although people have been able to bend them in Hard Enduro.

The guys who can feel the difference don't ask for it. They get paid and prepped by sponsors.

This sounds like a guy who will always blame others, then his bike, then... and much further down the line himself. Doesn't matter what you would have ridden, he would be mad at you.

The promised functionalities that didn't come or behind a paywall are a bloody shame indeed. However much of the rest is pretty defendable i suppose. - All updates so far have been upgrades. Never removed something or made the bike worse. - They don't believe in the electronic clutch. With good...

I would love to see their pro subscription turn into a one time buy or, indeed, as a "free" addition when buying an Alpha. People are finding out (as i've heard from dealers) 60 hp is enough. That way they can make a bigger gap between the 60 and the Alpha and thus lure people into buying the...

Yeah but only for so long and it's very annoying. I want to have the option to turn it off.

How is having an adjustable TC a downside?

I feel for those guys though. I work at an industrial company with a slow proces but with huge cashflows and profits. Everything is slow. Every step is looked at from a million angles and costs of every small change goes accompanied by huge amounts of money.

From what i've heard from former employees working on the project the problem wasn't the engineers. KTM management wanted industry and car standards implemented that never were meant to be applied to motorcycles. That's a very good way to make costs explode, product development delay and deliver...

Just keep in mind that the biggest enemy of a good ride is trying to have a perfect one. Don't forget to ride when waiting and/or building ;)