Search results

Well here is one video of Pascuet. Pretty much to show the level of the Blue line routes you can opt to take. Some hillclimbs in between just for fun.

But also under 4 hours at a wall outlet. That being 3.5kW means an absolute top of 14kWh IF 0-100% can be done at max charging. I have a strong sence that that 7 is the kWh rating of the battery. The heavy weight is just Honda being Honda :ROFLMAO: Stopping half an hour after every 100 km...

That would be the perfect outcome. I imagine there are more powerfull battery cells than what they use in the production model. That way they could finish.

130 km of range with a 17 kWh battery? At 200 km/h? With that claimed range i would think 7-10kW. They claim a 110km/h sustained top speed. I don't see a proper motorcycle here but for proper motorcycle money.

Taking risk is one thing and i love seeing it. But it's one thing jumping between 2 buildings that you think you will probably make the jump or knowing you won't make it. The one is called bravery, the other stupidity. Loosing is not an issue, starting brand, probably not top riders etc. But...

As a new brand trying to sell bikes you can and should be scared of humilation. Not in the way of loosing, but for not finishing. The 1,0 missed 10-12 minutes of race time to complete a GP. That's 1/3rd of a race! They 1.2 will stand a better chance, but if that extra 20% claim holds true it...

There are 2 coincidences here. Both are the same cell groups and both are november 2023 models. I do remember the "2nd gen" (the one that got a metal inverter cover) having a slightly different looking battery. So maybe this is a startup production issue and is fixed in newer models. In the end...

Yess exactly that. So i would recommend you follow that procedure and do as they tell you.

They did accept the replacement. It will be the 6.5 since the 7.2 does not fit. They asked me in the emails to balance charge first, but i could actually tell them that i allready did that, since i truly did. The guy i spoke in the video call spoke with a Spanish accent.

Yes and no. The total amount of it is dictated by the motor. At what speed it happens is dictated by gearing. For example an ICE with 6 gears and meets peak hp 6 times over the wheelspeed range. At say 15, 25, 45, 60, 80 and 90 km/h depending on the gear ratios per gear. Same applies to...

Sure it is relative to the wheelspeed, but is dictated by what the motor delivers and further modified by gearing. That is not something we were discussing was it? The curve is very smooth, but far from flat. The lower ones are quite flat sure, but the top one is most certainly an curve...

Just read the last post again ;) The HP per wheelspeed. That's what the car industry has been doing for over a century and it's actually what gearing does. The horsepower curve is also not flat. It is an actual curve. Just look up that dyno i posted not that long ago. Edit: Here it is: The...

The torque curve isn't flat on the Stark. Dyno's have shown a curve in rear wheel torque and power. But true enough much flatter than ICE's. There is a big distinction between wheel HP/speed and motor HP/speed that you seem to mis out of all of this. Here is the proof HP per wheelspeed changes...

The maximum amount of HP stays the same yes, the Torque will double as well. But the top HP will come at 1/2 the wheel speed since the motor will be running the same RPM at top power. Agree? So as established above you have now lowered the amount of revolutions of the rear wheel needed to...

Torque is a stationairy force Nm. The amount of force that's needed to move an object is power in J or W (or HP so you will). By changing the gearing you change the amount of HP per revolution of the rear wheel by changing the Torque part of the Formula. HP = Torque × RPM / 7023. Change the...

True, but when talking MX GP (like the OP) there are quite many 30 +2 on all terrains. I think that would turn into a humilation so better they don't join yet.

Well, just tell them the truth excluding the app. Your case is a clear problem out of itself. Just send them a solid email without drawing too much conclusions or being angry about it. In my experience they take some time to react, but have been very correct in their answers when you remain calm...

Although i would not be against shorter motos i think it's a bad idea to do it at the same time E bikes want to join. It's a very concervative fanbase that really, really, really dislikes rules that favor ''new'' or ''green'' or something like that. And if battery's keep improving at the 7-8%...

I use the stock phone with stock app every single ride. I have only used the app for testing so i would know it would work as a back-up if i would crash the Stark phone. Even if the app would only show state of charge i would have been happy.

Onecould also use that fast riders (semi or ex pro's) here in the Netherlands drain the battery in 20 minutes. IF the 1.2 indeed does 20% more range that would give you 26 minutes. That being less than 30 + 2 laps is concerning.