Search results

At steep hillclimbs where ground speed does not exceed 50-60km/h. At some point the rear wheel looses tracktion due to it slipping or jumping. Then the wheel will spin up to too high speeds. At an ICE the rev limiter of that gear will keep it in check. On the Stark it will rev to the moon. That...

I've made a map that could explain the above. It cuts power to 10hp after a certain speed, thus not having the rear wheel spinning away and keeping on the edge of traction.

I've noticed improvement in traction on most of the early MX updates. Also noticeable more range. My "traction control" map is doing great. I think i will make 2 of those. One for slower climbs and one for longer steeper ones.

Well don't forget Damon...

I have no traction control.

I have made this little map for hillclimbs. Functions like some kind of traction control uphill. When you jump the rear wheel doesn't spin up to the moon so upon landing much more grip. Same for breaking grip when heavy on the throttle uphill. Based on the normal 35hp map.

Good to hear! We will stick to in and close around the park. We will be in Pascuet Saturday and Sunday, you're more than welcome to join as well ;)

Now some time later i'm back in Pascuet. The EX looks great in it's natural habitat! Almost a shame to start smashing it up 😅

The gap new is 1000. Later upgrade is 1300. You see that often with all brands that upgrades from the factory are cheaper than later added. Makes sense to trigger a "buy now" reflex at the first sale.

KTM discs fit on the MX1.0. so i would assume on all Starks.

Solid review (y) I think an Electric 690 rival would be great. Varg with a double battery and some comfort options and a DC charger should weigh about the same as a 690. Now that would be a dyke/canyon weapon without compromise.

You used a slightly different tyre size so our results vary ;)

Should be off by around 15%

This doesn't need to be a new model. They've been implementing updates on existing models from the start. An early MX1.0 and later ones had some very different components. The MX1.2 had so many new parts it was impossible to interchange E bits. So it became a new model. But only a 1.2, not a 2...

Didn't watch it to be fair. However that could also just be a low hp setting.

12 vs 13 shouldn't matter much. But on my MX1.0 a 13 vs 15 could get as much as 10-15% gain in range.

I use 13 on the street so my speedo remains true with stock rear sprocket. If the speedo wasn't an issue i would go 15 on the front and stock or smaller on the rear. It will get you better range as well.

Or the 260 on the SM wheels. For on the street it still brakes more than fine. For proper SM it will overheat as i found out :ROFLMAO:

Your speedo will be off by about 8% luckely that's exactly what a 13 instead of 12 does for you. For actual dirt enduro riding a 13 or 14 is betteranyways. The 12 is wayyy to steep for anything exept Gnarly stuff.

You're missing the tiny pin. Mine has broken out of the left hand rear brake as well. Since new from the dealer.