Wow - could not possibly disagree more! My Alta's throttle map/'curve' #1 feels weak from 0 to WOT, while #4 is stronger everywhere and way better for me and my riding style in every case. Not sure what's meant by "sensitive", I think in terms of RW torque/hp at specific throttle-rotation percentages.
I think that what
@fsfs means is the problem shown in this picture, in which the original curve is supposed to be a straight line; probably not what we have in our bikes:
and this is one reason for which I usually dislike such curves for joysticks when playing flight simulators.
By the way, as far as I know our brains perceive things in a logarithmic way and that's why the magnitude of stars is logarithmic and the audio volume is, too. I read that even our perceprion of force is logarithmic.
Another thing to consider is that with one only gear the throttle position is not reset every like 15 mph like when shifting on ICE bikes and so to just keep a constat high speed the throttle should be at a high percentage of rotation.
Then, in order to feel a more linear acceleration, which depends linearly on force, I suspect that we would need a rising curve like the one on the right, so that at higher speeds power would rise faster and also compensate for our logarithmic brain.
Anyways I guess that if we had the possibility to set curves and maybe save many, we would find what works best for each track and for each ground condition.