Correct. High speed and low speed are defined by the angular speed that the handlebars are turning. The other advantage of the Scotts offroad damper design when riding in the woods (vs. MX) is that it has reduced resistance returning to center in the low speed damping. (BTW, the Scotts road/roadracing version is not valved this way) After four to six hours in an enduro you have saved a lot of effort. And having the damper lets you ride with a looser grip on the handlebars so for me it is a notable difference in fatigue level by the end of a race or long ride. Plus it may have helped me avoid a crash or two as well.
All that said, if something moves forward on an adapter (and if it will work with bar risers), I'm in for at least one and probably two.
You saved me the effort of typing all of this up.
Low resistance back to center is key for me on single track, saves a ton of energy over the course of a days ride.
And as mentioned, be careful which Scotts/Ohlins you purchase, make sure its the dirt bike model, the street bike models are high resistance back to center, not good for dirt bikes.
As far as damper install interfering with the display, a typical underbar/sub mount should solve that issue. Of course that only works if you can live with the bars being raised.
I have my Scotts damper on the shelf waiting for some type of underbar/sub mount compatible post solution, so I would be interested on a post mount too.
Taller pins can be sourced directly from Scotts so a post mount that works for the standard over the bars setup may also work with an underbar/sub mount.