Search results

My rear sprocket is a 47 I run mostly higher speed offroad or mx some high speeds too 131.9 kmh at the top of billys ridge. Going to a 14 I found it had a slight push wide effect and some windup in the rear suspension, but i got used to that straight away. I turned the regain down to 14 percent...

I would try a 14 first Ironed out my range problem and makes the front easier to loft as well I have a mx1 though I am not sure if the reduction gearing is the same. Erwin should be pretty much on the money with this one. Make sure to put some sealant on the sprocket cover bolts I have heard...

What about surron?

YES Try a 13 or maybe even a 14 Worked wonders on my mx1 A standard ktm husk fits on my mx1 cheap too.

My apology's to anyone that has been offended by any of my posts. I will keep it seemly in the future, However I think some need to take those rose tinted glasses off .

I own 5 motorcycles including a zx14 streetbike that makes 118 ft of torque and runs 9s on the quater mile at 150 mph in street trim. With me on it. The stark seems a bit docile even set on full noise.

Ha I will be racing the stark next season so. At the moment I would say in mx2

!@#$%^&*()_+ 😤 the bikes a slow piece of shit end of story

As they say, Don't believe the hype. I have done things on this bike too where I just go how the f did it do that unbelievable, but the reliability problems and weight have been a major frustration. Over a 10 lap race the stark is around 1/3 of a lap behind, with me on it. A lot of my posts...

As i have said before . It is not a pissing competition(no stalkers please) I timed the stark back to back with the 450 and the surron ultra bee Read my previous posts. I have been easy on it. During run 1 for the stark (farmgate track) the bike shut off completely dnf you cant get much slower...

I can send you m qc/s email if anyone wants to start a war.

All good vic that's right the bike makes around 63hp and 70 ft of torque my bike weighed 124 kgs not 118 i am here to try and improve the ev world not just bag it for not being perfect. the mx1 was not a good bike but it was the only mx bike too, and congratulations to stark for actually...

As i said vic actually read what i wrote they are facts not bull sh8t lies written in some brochure.

The bike is slow I have tested it back to back in a number of scenarios 450 smashed it on lap times. The stark is heavy and slow feels like a adventure bike. I am over all you dumb asses with no credentials saying it is not. Go race it and prove me wrong. All I hear is excuses and keyboard...

stop reading the brochure bunch of f wits

My husqvarna fc 2023 450 is bog standard and is more like 40 lbs lighter both in race ready trim it carries its weight way better too. I rode the stark on the mx2 setting today. It felt pretty good i did miss the ease of lofting the front the mx1 setting gives. I do wish people would stop making...

I have 4 bikes jd pro mx in Australia is mostly amateurs .A lot of effort has stopped me from just throwing the thing in the bin . It is still heavy and slow ,but it has many advantages, less fatigue and quiet, but who wants to ride a slow bike? Australasia is a good environment for developing...

lol read the second line again vic321 I have tested this bike for over a year it is heavy and slow. settting is mx1 race mode. I ride bikes , I don't drive them.

I am looking for the weight saving. The proposed 6.0 from flux comes up short and i don't want the extra weight of the 7.2 110 kg and 6.5 looks achievable with the later cells?

My original thought was to have 2 bikes. But then the bike did not have the performance to warrant going there. A stark 1.2 with a 6.5 kw battery would get me where I want to be. I probably should test a stock one anyway.