Getting back on the subject of AMA restrictions on electric bikes...I did get a call from Mike Burkeen at AMA. He explained that AMA does have a Steering Committee to address this. There are rules at americanmotorcyclist.com, racing, racing and resources, racing rulebook, competition rulebook page 41. Currently it allows Mini-E Jr and Sr. and allows further eligibility through event supplemental rules, specific to each event. Those allowed through supplemental rules are only allowed in open non-displacement classes. Mike did explain that AMA's primary concern is that electric bikes are too quiet thus a safety concern. I indicated that a noise-emitting device could be considered. Let's hope that AMA develops some fair, reasonable rules that allow electric bikes to compete.
Are you AgileMike on Vital? A new post covers this subject, with Mike's responses.
Re: Stark-My conversation with Mike Burkeen, AMA Deputy Director of Racing
First, I will say that I'm seeing progress, a post on e-bikes that hasn't turned into a complete shit show.
GuyB booted me a few years back during CV, so any ideas I post here, on TT and various FB sites have a way of showing up over there in the arena of ideas.
The idea that rules have to be forever is flawed. The AMA falling back on the BIG mistake in the 2t/4t classes, and not wanting it to happen again is BS. Those rules should have been amended long ago.
The idea that because no other motorsports are running gas and electric together is another BS excuse. They aren't MX/SX. Mixing gas and electric is already happening worldwide, more every day. Dirt bikes and drag racing is one of the few areas where Electrics are able to demonstrate their advantages.
On the subject of protecting the legacy gas manufacturer's investments in the sport, they made those decisions of their own free will, including Beta, Triumph and Ducati and Kove. Technology marches on, and nobody is guaranteed that their technology should be grandfathered in for perpetuity. Alta, Cannondale, Maico, Montesa, Bultaco, CZ and more didn't get special treatment.
Parity. This is a tough one, as in this sport it has long been accepted that different engine sizes are legitimate ways to make things fair. It's a flawed concept that IMO has held the sport back forever. By having so many choices, head to head competition is avoided and the competition is watered down. Shane Watts won a round of GNCC on every sized bike KTM made. It's the rider, not the bike, and separating classes by skill (lap times) is much more sensible. We see in the Vet classes the bike doesn't matter.
Safety. The noise issue is BS, gas bikes have the same problem. I'm OK with a quick fix of noise makers, but it's only fair that ALL bikes run them. (see how dumb that sounds?)
As much as I am totally opposed to more classes (there's already over 40 and it's killing the sport) in this case it's probably better than nothing to get the AMA started. Obviously the Open, Vet and Women's don't need to be separated.
The AMA is now reacting to market pressure from promoters and riders, as we knew they would. They aren't pro active in the least, this issue dates back to Alta's. It doesn't take years, and steering committee's to keep the sport moving forward. If the AMA doesn't react, they will be left behind as the sport moves on. Their value as a sanctioning body is already on thin ice for a variety of reasons. It would have been expected already, but a long range roll out is long overdue.
2025 1st year- separate classes
2026 2nd year - integrate with 450's and noise makers at the amateur level
2027 3rd year - integrate with an Open Unlimited Class in Pro racing (development of both gas and electric is needed)
Beagle, do me a favor and share some of my ideas over there? Let them know it's from Johnny Depp.
As much as I am totally opposed to more classes (there's already over 40 and it's killing the sport) in this case it's probably better than nothing to get the AMA started. Obviously the Open, Vet and Women's don't need to be separated.