Search results

True, only lifting it it's an ''issue'' but not really even.

True, but again, should fit as is. Was a bit late sending pictures to the supplier, but i'm waiting for their answer. A local wheel specialist says he can center it for me. If the supplier doesn't help i could always do that. The OEM hub is still in the OEM rim since it's mainly my MX/Enduro bike.

With my final gear ratio my KTM 990 pulls a casual 1700Nm in first gear. Then all of a sudden the 938 of the Stark doesn't sound that extreem anymore.

Uhu at nearly a 1000 euro difference while the KTM wheels should fit as many have shown (an i've seen with Enduro/MX sets).

Might be so, but than the Stark rotor should fit even better. Both have no offset.

Haha very true. You'd be amazed by what torque numbers ICE's can deliver rear at the rear wheel in first gear.

Both have the same torque number at the countershaft. Difference is in gearing.

The Extreme range all suck in sand since the're not made for it. They deform way too much to be usefull in sand. In sand you need quite stiff knobbies since the ground has to deform, not the tyre (other way around than rocks). Actually the Mitas C02 Stoneking sucks in the real gnarly rocks but...

That's exactly what i don't want with this topic. Any idiot can compare part numbers (except my local Beta dealer, but that's another topic). But what i hope to achieve is to build a database on what does and doesn't fit where the part numbers don't match up.

I couldn't really find a topic that bundles the knowledge of what parts are interchangeable and could be considerd upgrades. I opened one some time ago about plastic fitment. But a more overall topic might be nice...

Spacers slide in perfectly. Wheel perfect in center but the disc is 2mm too far out. This is the same with the 260mm OEM rotor, 260 KTM rotor and 320mm KTM rotor. Other spacers move the issue. I have other spacers that slide the rotor to perfect center in the caliper, but wheel is then 2mm out...

Main reason is way higher compression and thus louder bangs per ignition.

Checked it. 14-48 the MX later got. So an even bigger gap.

Yeah i believe the MX is 14-50. That would make an 11% gap in speed per rpm.

I have to agree a little bit on the noise though. While training with slow riders (i'm slow, but even i pass people) you have to be really carefull because they don't notice you comming up. I have that less on my 2 stroke. The 4 strokes really don't hear you although the guys riding enduro bikes...

I'm not sure what you mean? You would want the red part in my picture right? So the topside? That is different between both because the MX is missing 2 points where the rear EX fender (the black thing that i added) bolts on to. I know that it fits and works how i put it, but if you add the...

Didn't the EX come with very short gearing? I believe i heard as low as 12-50 stock although that might be off. That would add significant RPM's and thus sound. I do hate they take speed from the motor itself. Changing the gearing or wheels would greatly affect ground speed. If only they put an...

I have a Stark and a 300 2 stroke Enduro. When i ride that there is not a single 450 MX rider that can hear me comming up. I have an easier time to hear a Stark comming up on my 300 than i do hearing a 2 stroke comming up when i ride a 4 stroke. To make the kind of noise to overcome a 450 you...

The KYB's sure are "the shit" and can do anything when setup well. However you can't please rider who like stiff and jumping tabletops and riders who like plush and do rock crawling at the same time. I have them in the Stark and on my Beta RR 300 Racing. The Stark is setup for MX and the Beta...

All licence holders (all riders) got an email stating this. The explanation was that those KTM bikes were empirically proven save over the past few years... This didn't hold for long since quite the outcry started and even local governments got involved because they have great interest in...